Conservation of the threatened Sarus Crane Grus antigone (Linnaeus, 1758) around Alwara Lake in Kaushambi District, Uttar Pradesh, India

 

Shri Prakash 1, Shubh Narain 2 & Sunil Kumar 3

 

1,2,3 Department of Zoology, Kulbhaskar Ashram Post Graduate College, Allahabad, Uttar Pradesh 211001, India

1 sriprakasht80@gmail.com (corresponding author), 2 shubhnarainmishra@gmail.com, 3 drsunielkumar@gmail.com

 

 

Abstract: The present study deals with the distribution and conservation of the globally threatened Sarus Crane Grus antigone in Alwara Lake of district Kaushambi, Uttar Pradesh, India.  It proved to be an important site since the lake under investigation was totally unexplored from the conservation point of view.  Hence it was aimed at protecting the habitat of this threatened bird species by suggesting conservation measures through rural masses and policy makers.  Birds were recorded in all the three transects of the lake surveyed by the authors, however, their relative abundance varied in each transect.  A total of 487 cranes was actually observed, although more cranes were claimed to exist in this area by the local people.  Cropland habitat harboured the maximum number of cranes.  A positive correlation was observed between the crane numbers and the area of agricultural land.  The authors recommend continuous population census of this species and declaration of the entire lake zone as a conservation area.

 

Keywords:  Alwara Lake, conservation, distribution, Sarus Crane, wetland, threatened.

 

 

doi: http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3637.5726-30   |  ZooBank: urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:47E776FB-8E53-429B-B3E1-577365F62E1E

 

Editor: Hem Sagar Baral, Zoological Society of London Nepal Office, Kathmandu, Nepal.            Date of publication: 26 May 2014 (online & print)

 

Manuscript details: Ms # o3637 | Received 24 May 2013 | Final received 10 April 2014 | Finally accepted 04 May 2014

 

Citation: Prakash, S., S. Narain & S. Kumar (2014). Conservation of the threatened Sarus Crane Grus antigone (Linnaeus, 1758) around Alwara Lake in Kaushambi District, Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of Threatened Taxa 6(5): 5726–5730; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.o3637.5726-30

 

Copyright: © Prakash et al. 2014. Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License. JoTT allows unrestricted use of this article in any medium, reproduction and distribution by providing adequate credit to the authors and the source of publication.

 

Funding: None.

 

Competing Interest:  The authors declare no competing interests.

 

Acknowledgements: Authors are highly grateful to the Management and Principal K.A.P.G. College, Allahabad for providing necessary laboratory facilities in the department. Thanks are also to the administration district Kaushambi, Uttar Pradesh for help during the survey programme.

 

 

 

For figures, images, tables -- click here

 

 

Sarus Crane Grus antigone is the state bird of Uttar Pradesh.  Because of its declining numbers the species has been listed as globally threatened (Vulnerable) (BirdLife International 2012).  It belongs to the order Gruiformes and family Gruidae.  The highest population density of Sarus Crane is inseparably associated with wetland habitats. Several investigators have tried to study different aspects of Sarus Crane (Meine & Archibald 1996; Sundar 2000, 2006, 2011; et al. 2003, 2010, 2012; Borad et al. 2004; Mukherjee et al. 2002; Muralidharan 2004; Kaur & Choudhary 2008; Aryal et al. 2009; IUCN 2012; Clements et al. 2013).  About 30% of the global population of this species is dependent on these wetlands.  In addition an indulgent local population has insured the well being of the Sarus Crane.  Excessive use of water for irrigation which converts agricultural lands to saline soil and indirectly builds pressure on wetlands for the fulfilment of community requirements, is a potential threat.

District Kaushambi of Uttar Pradesh comprises a vast range of flora and fauna and wetlands including Alwara Lake due to heavy rainfall and floodwaters from the rivers Yamuna and Ganga.  Till now this lake was totally unexplored from the conservation point of view. If ecological importance is integrated with hydrological properties and community benefits of wetlands, it would be easier to convince the local population for the need for conservation of threatened species such as the Sarus Crane.  Considering the above facts, we undertook these studies by suggesting measures to protect its habitat through continuous population census with the help of local masses, farmers and policy makers, i.e., Government of India and Governtment of Uttar Pradesh.

 

Study area

The study area was divided into three major transects based on its vastness, diversity and habitat of Sarus Crane as indicated in the map of the area (Image 1).  They are: (i) Paur Kashi Rampur, (ii) Tikara, (iii) Shahpur.

The lake is surrounded by agricultural fields and connected to the river Yamuna towards transect III and terminal part of Kishanpur lift canal towards transect I.  Thus the habitat in the form of wetland is perennial, although during summer the water level falls.  During the rainy season the water depth rises to about 20m and during summer (dry periods) the depth comes down to about 15m.  The lake has derived its name from village Alwara.  Locally it is called Alwara Taal.  Alwara Lake is a naturally formed lake and covers about 40ha.  The surrounding transects are Paur Kashi Rampur in the east, Tikara in the north Shahpur in the south and the river Yamuna in the west.

 

Materials and Methods

We used binoculars (7x35 and 8x40-BEZIF BM-9), camera, motorbike, chappu boat, field stick etc. for survey purposes.  The findings are based upon the work conducted between September 2011 to December 2012. Surveys were conducted in the morning between 0600–0900 hr and evening 1400–1700 hr during our routine field trips.  All the observations were made while moving in a chappu boat (Image 2) and walking along the croplands, marshlands, natural areas.  Birds seen and heard were noted for the particular site.  Identification of different species was aided by using standard guides such as Ali (1941), Wildlife Institute of India (1999) and Aryal et al. (2009).  Juvenile, pairs and flocks were included during population census.  Besides actual sightings, inquiries from local people were also made to ensure the estimate of existing population and their perceptions about the existence of the crane.  Census was avoided during rainy days.  The encounter rate of Sarus Crane population was calculated as the number of cranes counted over the area surveyed (in m2).

Systat 12 (Wilkinson 1982) software was used for the statistical analysis of data.  The data of cropping pattern and agricultural land were collected from district Kaushambi headquarters.

Location and access to Alwara Lake: By road the lake is 85km away from Allahabad District, 45km from Manjhanpur headquarter of district Kaushambi and 290km from Lucknow, capital of Uttar Pradesh.  Its nearest railway station is Bharwari at a distance of 50km and nearest airport Bamrauli.  Allahabad is at a distance of 75km.  It is situated between 25024’05.84 25025’10.63”N & 81011’39.49’’–81012’57.95”E.

Climate:  Winter - occurs between the months of late October to early March, mid December to mid January is the season of severe cold; spring - mid February to the end of April; summer - approaches in the month of April and ends in late June, it is marked by high velocity of winds in the months of May and June; rainy -  approximately 350mm rainfall observed annually from July to October; autumn - it commences in mid October and ends in late November.  Maximum temperature is 48–50 0C during summer and minimum 1–3 0C during winter season.

 

Results

Sarus Crane was recorded in all the three transects of the lake as shown in Images 3–5.  Population comparison was determined as a single, pair, pair with one juvenile, pair with two juveniles and flocks comprising adults and juveniles.  Their relative abundance varied in each transect as shown in Fig. 1, Tables 1,2.  Transect II harboured the maximum number of cranes (207), while it was minimum in Transect III (104).  A total of 487 cranes were actually sighted, however more cranes were claimed to exist in this area by the local people.  Crop land vegetation was abundant in Transect II (Image 4), while mainly marshland habitat was noticed in Transect I (Image 3) with anthropogenic activities.  Transect III mainly included littoral zone of the lake with emergent vegetation which remain firmly rooted in shore substratum (Image 5).

Seasonal variations in the distribution pattern of the Sarus Crane were also recorded as shown in Tables 1, 2 and Fig. 1.  A higher number of cranes was recorded during winter compared to summer.  A positive correlation was observed between the crane numbers and the area of agricultural land, e.g., paddy field, sugarcane field, kharif field etc.  During the survey upto 165 Sarus Cranes were observed along the roadside transect of the lake.  By this time, the cranes had established their territories and were likely to breed.

 

Discussion and Conclusions

Wetlands are more valuable economic resources when retained in their natural or semi-natural state since they support a wide variety of flora and fauna.  Alwara Lake is an old marshy natural wetland situated in the tropical part of India.  From the ecological point of view the site is very favourable for Sarus Crane Grus antigone distribution.

The highest population of Sarus Crane was reported in Transect II (207) during the survey probably due to availability of sufficient food, mainly small molluscs, crustaceans, worms and grains present in cropland vegetation, e.g., paddy fields and other kharif crops.  Borad et al. (2004) and Sundar et al. (2010) also found paddy fields favourable for this species.  Littoral zone (Transect III) of lake harboured fewer cranes due to the less favourable habitat.  Although marshland (Transect I) is known as the optimum habitat for the cranes (Nandi 2006) the present investigation showed that Transect I had fewer individuals (116) as compared to Transect II.  This may be due to anthropogenic activities.  Moreover, during the dry season (high temperatures) the number of cranes decreased in the survey area compared to the wet season since the scarcity of food compels them to move and search for better feeding zones.  While estimating the population of Sarus Cranes, Mukherji et al. (2002) observed that openness of habitat is a requirement for the existence of the crane.  Further, during population census they realized that the presence of inundated paddy fields or land under irrigation were not the only factors determining the distribution of Sarus Crane, but the vegetation at the edge of the crop field and the type of crop grown also affected the availability of the cranes.  In our observation also, the openness of habitat was a major factor for the existence of Sarus Crane.

The study of literature indicates that the future of the Indian Sarus Crane is closely tied to the quality of small wetlands in India that are exposed to heavy human use and suffer from high rates of sewage inflow, extensive agricultural runoff, high level of pesticide residues and intensification of agricultural system (Nandi 2006; Aryal et al. 2009; Sundar 2012).  They have further reported that the magnitude of decline in Sarus Crane population is such that it has been categorized as a threatened species.  There are proposals to move this species from Schedule IV to Schedule I of the Wildlife (Protection) Act and take some special measures for its conservation (Nandi 2006).  As such the authors have initiated a public awareness campaign through farmers to save this species from going extinct and recommend the declaration of the entire lake zone as a conservation area through policy makers (Lok Sabha and Rajya Sabha).  There should be protection of wetlands to provide additional habitat for Sarus Cranes by controlling sedimentation of the wetlands.  Sundar (2006, 2011),  Clements et al. (2013) and Gulland (2013) have conducted, detailed studies on this threatened species and proposed direct reward for the protection of biodiversity as an effective tool for delivering conservation outcomes in a way that also delivers developmental benefits to the local people.  Sundar (2011) based on his studies on the conservation potential of an agricultural landscape in two districts of Uttar Pradesh, where agricultural intensification and altered rainfall patterns are predicted, further emphasized that in countries like India, with a high human population, using agricultural areas as multifunctional systems to produce food for humans and retaining wildlife may be an efficient conservation strategy for many species.  Similar strategies may be adopted in this area to effectively save the threatened Sarus Crane which is the pride of Uttar Pradesh.

           

References

 

Ali, S. (1941). The Book of Indian Birds. The Bombay Natural History Society, Bombay, 457pp.

Aryal, A., T.K. Shrestha, D.S. Sen, B. Upreti & N. Gautam (2009). Conservation regime and local population ecology of Sarus Crane (Grus antigone antigone) in west-central region of Nepal. Journal of Wetlands Ecology 3: 1–11; http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/jowe.v3i0.2224

BirdLife International (2012). Grus antigone. In: IUCN 2013. IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2013.2. <www.iucnredlist.org>. Downloaded on 19 May 2014.

Borad, C.K., A. Mukherjee, S.B. Patel & B.N. Parasharya (2004). Breeding performance of Indian Sarus Cranes Grus antigone antigone in the paddy crop agroecosystem. Biodiversity and Conservation 11(5): 795–805; http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1015367406200

Clements, T., H. Rainey, D. An, V. Rous, S. Tan, S. Thong, W.J. Sutherland & E.J. Milner-Gulland (2013). An evaluation of effectiveness of a direct payment for biodiversity conservation: The bird nest protection programme in the northern plain of Cambodia. Biological Conservation 157: 50–59; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.020

Kaur, J. & B.C. Choudhury (2008). Conservation of the vulnerable Sarus Crane Grus antigone antigone in Kota, Rajasthan, India: a case study of community involvement. Oryx 42(3): 452–255.

Meine, C.D. & G.W. Archibald (eds.) (1996). The Crane: Status, Survey and Conservation Action Plan. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland and Cambridge, UK. xi+282pp.

Mukherjee, A., C.K. Borad & B.N. Parasharya (2002). Comparative account of population and breeding pair density of the Indian Sarus crane (Grus antigone antigone) in Kheda District, Gujrat. Zoos’ Print Journal 17(8): 839–843; http://dx.doi.org/10.11609/JoTT.ZPJ.17.8.839-43

Muralidharan, S. (2004). Aldrin poising of Sarus Crane (Grus antigone) and granivorous birds in Keoladeo National Park, Bharatpur, India. Ecotoxicology 2(3): 196–202; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/BF00116424

Nandi, P.K. (2006). Protection of habitat of Sarus crane Grus antogone in Bhoj wetland, India, pp. 309–310. In: Boere, G.C., C.A. Gal Braith & D.A. Stroud (eds.). Water Birds Around The World. The stationery office, Edinburgh, UK.

Sundar, K.S.G. (2011). Agricultural intensification, rainfall patterns, and large waterbird breeding success in the extensively cultivated landscape of Uttar Pradesh, India. Biological Conservation 144(12): 3055–3063; http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2011.09.012

Sundar, K.S.G. & A.K. Swati (2012). Methodological, temporal and spatial factors affecting modeled occupancy of resident birds in the perennially cultivated landscape of Uttar Pradesh, India. Landscape Ecology 27(1): 59–71; http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10980-011-9666-3

Sundar, K.S.G. & B.C. Choudhary (2003). Nest sanitation in Sarus Cranes, Grus antigone in Uttar Pradesh, India. Forktail 19: 144–145.

Sundar, K.S.G. (2000). Distribution, demography and conservation status of the Indian Sarus Crane (Grus antigone) in India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 97(3): 319–339.

Sundar, K.S.G. & S. Subramanya (2010). Bird use of rice fields in the Indian subcontinent. Waterbirds 33 (Special Publication 1): 44–70.

Sundar, K.S.G. (2006). Conservation of the Sarus crane Grus antigone in Uttar Pradesh, India. Journal of the Bombay Natural History Society 103(2–3): 182–190.

Wildlife Institute of India (1999). Training workshop on wetland research methodology measuring and monitoring biological diversity. WII, Dehra Dun, 5–10pp.

Wilkinson, L. (1982). SYSTAT: Statistical analysis and graphical presentation of scientific and engineering data, version 12, University of Illinois, Chicago. Systat Software, Inc. Washington, 225pp.